🔄 Improvement

This directory describes continuous improvement and corrective-action concepts related to AITL education and training.

It defines how the training system itself is reviewed, corrected, and improved to ensure ongoing competence and responsibility assurance.

---

🎯 Purpose of Improvement Activities

Documents in this directory explain:

• 🔍 How training feedback is collected and reviewed
• 🧭 How gaps in competence are identified and addressed
• 🔄 How lessons learned are reflected in training updates
• 🛡 How responsibility boundaries are reinforced through improvement

Improvement activities focus on the training system, not on assigning blame to individuals.

---

🧩 Scope of Improvement

Improvement under AITL may include:

• Refinement of training objectives or scope
• Updates to training architecture or learning paths
• Clarification of verification criteria
• Strengthening of responsibility or escalation rules

🚫 This directory does not redefine technical designs or implementations.

---

🔗 Relation to Training Records and Verification

Improvement activities are typically triggered by:

• 📄 Training records indicating conditional or failed verification
• ✅ Verification findings identifying systematic gaps
• 🔁 Repeated misunderstandings of responsibility boundaries

Inputs from:

• 03_Training_Record
• 04_Verification

are used as objective evidence for improvement decisions.

---

📘 ISO 9001 Alignment

This directory supports:

• 📌 ISO 9001 Clause 10 (Improvement)
• 📌 Corrective actions based on verified evidence
• 📌 Continual improvement of education and competence assurance processes

All improvements must remain aligned with the AITL Training Policy.

---

🛡 Note
Improvement under AITL strengthens how competence is assured,
not who is responsible.
Responsibility for engineering decisions always remains human-owned.