π‘οΈ True Robust Control
Operating Hβ Robustness with FSM and LLM
π Links
| Language | GitHub Pages π | GitHub π» |
|---|---|---|
| πΊπΈ English |
Overview
True Robust Control is a design philosophy that redefines classical $H_\infty$ robust control
as an operational capability, rather than a static offline guarantee.
Instead of assuming a fixed worst-case uncertainty,
this framework treats uncertainty as a state that is:
- π monitored,
- π§ interpreted,
- π and acted upon before theoretical guarantees break.
Core Idea
Robustness is not a number.
It is the ability to detect, decide, and adapt.
In this framework:
- $H_\infty$ control defines the guarantee boundary
- FSM manages operational state transitions
- LLM performs design-level reasoning
- Weight functions $W$ are used as tactical levers
Architecture at a Glance
The framework is built on the AITL (Adaptive Intelligent Three-Layer) structure:
-
Inner Loop
PID / $H_\infty$ control for real-time stability -
Middle Layer
FSM for degradation-aware mode switching -
Outer Layer
LLM for weight redesign decisions (offline only) -
Robust Monitor
Frequency-domain uncertainty evaluation
Key Concepts
- Uncertainty $\Delta$ is decomposed into:
- low-frequency components
- high-frequency components
- input-side components
- When effective $|\Delta|_\infty$ reaches 0.8,
the system proactively shifts its control strategy - Only the relevant weight is redesigned:
- $W_s$ : performance demand
- $W_t$ : robustness margin
- $W_u$ : actuator protection
- Never all weights at once
Relationship to AITL Types
-
A-Type
Base architecture and operational mechanism -
True Robust Control (this theme)
Operational robustness as a first-class design concept -
B-Type
Reliability-first extension with permissioned adaptation
Documents
-
Concept
Definition and motivation of True Robust Control -
Architecture
Layered structure and responsibility separation -
Uncertainty as State
Why $\Delta$ must be monitored, not assumed -
Weight Redesign Strategy
How and why only specific weights are modified -
Roadmap
Planned implementation and validation steps
Scope and Intent
This work is:
- β not a replacement for $H_\infty$ theory
- β not an AI-optimized control scheme
It is an attempt to formalize
how experienced control engineers actually operate robustness in the field.
Start Here
If you are new to this theme, begin with:
- Concept
- Architecture
- Uncertainty as State
Robust control is not about never failing.
It is about knowing when and how to step back safely.
This documentation evolves alongside the AITL Controller A-Type project.