โ Back to AI Control Safety Package
๐ Recovery Control Design
๐ฏ Role in This Package
Recovery Control Design is the final step of the
AI Control Safety Package.
Its role is to answer one critical question:
โ When things go wrong, how do we return safely โ and who decides?
This design step ensures that abnormal behavior does not lead to:
- โ Cascading failure
- โ Silent dependence on AI
- โ Undefined or ambiguous responsibility
Recovery is treated as a designed, governed process,
not as an emergency improvisation.
๐ง Overview
Recovery Control Design defines how a control system returns to a:
- ๐งฏ Safe
- ๐งฑ Stable
- ๐งญ Explainable
state after abnormal behavior, disturbances, degradation,
or unexpected operating conditions.
The objective is not automatic optimization.
The objective is:
Controlled, deterministic recovery with clear responsibility
Recovery is treated as a first-class operational mode,
not as an exception.
๐๏ธ Conceptual Recovery Flow
Recovery is explicit and supervised
Recovery behavior is governed by explicit supervisory logic,
fully independent of AI judgment.
stateDiagram-v2
Normal --> Recovery : Trigger detected
Recovery --> Stabilizing : Baseline active
Stabilizing --> Hold : Stability confirmed
Hold --> Normal : Re-entry approved
Design intent
- โ ๏ธ Any trigger forces exit from Normal operation
- ๐ซ AI has no authority during Recovery
- ๐ Return to Normal is never automatic
- ๐งญ Explicit approval is required for re-entry
๐งฉ What Is Recovery Control
Recovery Control is the explicit design of:
- โฑ๏ธ When the system is considered degraded or abnormal
- ๐งฏ How normal operation is suspended or limited
- ๐ฃ๏ธ Which path the system follows to reach a safe baseline
- ๐ค Who decides when recovery is complete
Recovery always prioritizes:
Safety ยท Predictability ยท Accountability
over continuity or performance.
๐ Design Scope
1๏ธโฃ Recovery Triggers
Explicit conditions that force entry into Recovery Mode:
- Detection of abnormal behavior or envelope violation
- Performance degradation beyond allowed limits
- Loss of confidence in AI-assisted decisions
- External or manual recovery requests
Triggers are explicit, conservative, and reviewable.
2๏ธโฃ Recovery Modes
- Dedicated Recovery Mode clearly separated from Normal operation
- Reduced authority and simplified control structure
- Complete separation from AI-assisted or adaptive modes
Recovery modes are:
Finite ยท Deterministic ยท Explainable
3๏ธโฃ Fallback & Baseline Control
- Transition to fixed, well-understood baseline controllers
- Guaranteed operability without AI involvement
- Known-safe behavior with bounded performance
Baseline control is a design guarantee,
not a failure or degraded feature.
4๏ธโฃ Controlled Re-Entry
- Explicit criteria for exiting Recovery Mode
- Optional, bounded re-enablement of AI functions
- Human approval or supervisory confirmation when required
Re-entry is:
๐ Explicit
๐ซ Never automatic
๐งช Example: Recovery Control for AI-Assisted Process Control
(Example details are intentionally omitted.)
Examples are used only to validate recovery logic
โnot to justify AI usage.
๐ซ What This Design Does NOT Do
This design explicitly avoids:
- Unrestricted self-healing
- AI-driven recovery completion
- Silent failure masking
- Guarantees of uninterrupted performance
Recovery favors:
Clarity over continuity
๐ฆ Deliverables
You will receive:
- ๐ Recovery trigger definitions
- ๐ Recovery mode structure and FSM transitions
- ๐งฑ Fallback and baseline control definition
- ๐งญ Controlled re-entry criteria
- ๐ A Recovery Control design summary (PDF or Markdown)
๐งโ๐ผ Typical Use Cases
- Long-term operation with degradation or drift
- Systems requiring reversible AI involvement
- Preparation for abnormal or off-nominal events
- Accountability after unexpected system behavior
๐ผ Engagement Details
| Item |
Details |
| Format |
Design discussion + analysis |
| Duration |
2โ3 hours |
| Fee guideline |
JPY 150,000 โ 400,000 |
โ ๏ธ Important Note
A system that cannot recover deterministically
is not suitable for AI-assisted control.
If safe recovery cannot be explicitly defined,
AI involvement must be:
๐ซ Restricted or removed
๐ Previous step:
โ Safety Envelope Design
๐ Back to package overview:
โ AI Control Safety Package
๐ง shinichi.samizo2@gmail.com
๐ samizo-aitl.github.io